What targeted muscle reinnervation does for amputation patients

June 10, 2020

So many activities of daily living require the use of a functional upper extremity. People who lose an arm due to amputation can modify their activities somewhat to adapt, but return to the pre-injury condition may not be feasible.

 

Until recently, a prosthesis that functioned similarly to the lost extremity was theoretical at best. However, it is now sometimes possible to restore function to a large degree with a myoelectric prosthesis. For this to be successful, the patient must first undergo a surgical procedure called targeted muscle reinnervation.

 

What does TMR do?

An amputation involves cutting across some of the motor nerves of the upper extremity. Motor nerves are those that send signals to the muscles from the brain telling them to move. According to the National Center for Biotechnology Information, targeted muscle reinnervation involves attaching those nerves to existing motor nerves still present in the trunk of the body or the remainder of the amputated limb. TMR makes it possible to control the new prosthesis with thought, just as one does with one’s natural arm.

Who is a candidate for TMR?

Johns Hopkins Medicine explains that if a patient has paralysis or damage to the nerves, he or she is not a candidate for TMR. The amputation must have occurred at the shoulder or the elbow, and it cannot have occurred more than 10 years prior. Following the procedure, the patient must be willing to participate in the necessary rehabilitation. Additionally, the soft tissues at the amputation site must be stable. A doctor can determine a patient’s eligibility with a medical review.

Trying to figure out bills after no longer working from accident
By Sarkisian Law Offices • October 6, 2026
If a crash ended your career, Indiana law allows recovery for lost earning capacity. How those claims are calculated, proven, and contested.
Gray child car seat secured on a black car back seat, facing sideways in the rear passenger area.
By Sarkisian Law Offices • September 29, 2026
Children are injured differently than adults in crashes. Pediatric injury patterns, Indiana car seat law, and why early settlements carry real risk.
Semi-truck traveling on a Northwest Indiana interstate highway
By Sarkisian Law Offices • September 22, 2026
A truck crash rarely has one liable party. Learn when an Indiana trucking company is responsible, from negligent hiring to hours-of-service violations.
Attorney reviewing a contract with a client across a desk in a law office
By Sarkisian Law Offices • September 15, 2026
What to ask in a free consultation with an Indiana injury lawyer, from contingency fees and case costs to comparative fault and filing deadlines.
Two cars after a rear-end collision on a Northwest Indiana road
By Sarkisian Law Offices • September 8, 2026
Is the rear driver always at fault in an Indiana rear-end crash? Not always. Learn how comparative fault, brake-checking, and evidence decide who pays.
Front wheel of a black motorcycle parked on a sunlit paved street
By Sarkisian Law Offices • September 3, 2026
Indiana insurers assume riders were reckless before reviewing evidence. See how that bias cuts settlements and what evidence pushes back.
Show More