Settling your catastrophic injury case

March 20, 2021

 

Did you know that the majority of legal claims related to catastrophic injuries actually do not go to trial? It is, in fact, much more common for the plaintiff and defendant to reach a settlement.

 

If you or somebody you love has suffered a catastrophic injury due to the negligence of another party, it is likely that the possibility of a settlement will come up during some part of the legal process. Whether or not you should accept a settlement for your catastrophic injury depends on how strong your case is and what you are willing to give up in order to reach a settlement.

How do I know how strong my case is?

Much of this has to do with research. An attorney can help you understand your chances regarding past jury verdicts and settlement outcomes in cases that are similar to yours. An attorney can also help you judge your chances of winning your case at trial. Much of your success at a jury trial will depend on the kind of evidence you have.

Why do I have to give up anything?

You will reach a settlement with the other party through negotiation. Typically, with negotiation, both parties must give up something in order to reach a compromise. What, exactly, you will need to give up in order to reach a settlement depends upon your specific case.

There are many benefits to settling catastrophic injury cases. Chief among them is that reaching a settlement usually takes far less time then taking a case to trial. However, this does not mean that settling is the best option in all cases. It is merely one option out of several when you are taking a catastrophic injury case to court.

Trying to figure out bills after no longer working from accident
By Sarkisian Law Offices • October 6, 2026
If a crash ended your career, Indiana law allows recovery for lost earning capacity. How those claims are calculated, proven, and contested.
Gray child car seat secured on a black car back seat, facing sideways in the rear passenger area.
By Sarkisian Law Offices • September 29, 2026
Children are injured differently than adults in crashes. Pediatric injury patterns, Indiana car seat law, and why early settlements carry real risk.
Semi-truck traveling on a Northwest Indiana interstate highway
By Sarkisian Law Offices • September 22, 2026
A truck crash rarely has one liable party. Learn when an Indiana trucking company is responsible, from negligent hiring to hours-of-service violations.
Attorney reviewing a contract with a client across a desk in a law office
By Sarkisian Law Offices • September 15, 2026
What to ask in a free consultation with an Indiana injury lawyer, from contingency fees and case costs to comparative fault and filing deadlines.
Two cars after a rear-end collision on a Northwest Indiana road
By Sarkisian Law Offices • September 8, 2026
Is the rear driver always at fault in an Indiana rear-end crash? Not always. Learn how comparative fault, brake-checking, and evidence decide who pays.
Front wheel of a black motorcycle parked on a sunlit paved street
By Sarkisian Law Offices • September 3, 2026
Indiana insurers assume riders were reckless before reviewing evidence. See how that bias cuts settlements and what evidence pushes back.
Show More